Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇöõÆ® healing abutment ³ôÀÌ¿Í Å¸Áø°¢µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ ŸÁø¹æ½Ä ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¾ÈÁ¤¼º ÃøÁ¤±â±âÀÇ ¼öÄ¡ Â÷ÀÌ

Differences in percussion-type measurements of implant stability according to height of healing abutments and measurement angle

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2018³â 56±Ç 4È£ p.278 ~ 286
¹Ú¾çÈÆ, À̼ºº¹, À̼®¿ø, ¹éÀåÇö, ÀÌÁ¤¿­,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Ú¾çÈÆ ( Park Yang-Hoon ) - °­µ¿°æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø »ýüÀç·á º¸Ã¶°ú
À̼ºº¹ ( Lee Sung-Bok ) - °­µ¿°æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø »ýüÀç·áº¸Ã¶°ú
À̼®¿ø ( Lee Suk-Won ) - °­µ¿°æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø »ýüÀç·áº¸Ã¶°ú
¹éÀåÇö ( Paek Jang-Hyun ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀÌÁ¤¿­ ( Lee Jeong-Yol ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸·Îº´¿ø ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ÀÎÁ¶°ñ¿¡ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ Á¶°ÇÀ¸·Î ½Ä¸³ÇÑ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ŸÁø¹æ½ÄÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¾ÈÁ¤¼º ÃøÁ¤±â±âÀÎ Periotest¿Í AnyCheckÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ¾ÈÁ¤¼º ¼öÄ¡¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÔ¿¡ À־, healing abutmentÀÇ ³ôÀÌ¿Í Å¸Áø°¢µµÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ °¢ ÃøÁ¤±â±âÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤¼º ¼öÄ¡ Â÷À̸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: ÃÑ 60°³ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ ÁÖ¹®Á¦ÀÛÇÑ ÀÎÁ¶°ñ ºí·Ï¿¡ ½Ä¸³ÇÏ°í 2, 3, 4, 5 mm ³ôÀÌÀÇ healing abutment¸¦ °¢°¢ 15°³¾¿ ³× ±×·ìÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î ü°áÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °¢°¢ ½Ä¸³ ÅäÅ©, implant stability test, Periotest value¸¦ ÃøÁ¤Çß´Ù. ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³ ½Ã 45 - 55 NcmÀÇ ÅäÅ©¸¦ À¯ÁöÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÀåÃà¿¡ ¼öÁ÷ÀÎ Áö¸éÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î, implant stability test´Â AnyCheckÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© 0¡Æ, 30¡ÆÀÇ ±â¿ï±â·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇßÀ¸¸ç Periotest value´Â Periotest MÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© 0¡Æ, 30¡ÆÀÇ ±â¿ï±â·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃøÁ¤°ªÀº Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ½Ä¸³ ÅäÅ©´Â ±×·ì °£ Åë°èÀû À¯ÀÇÂ÷°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. AnyCheck°ú Periotest MÀ¸·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇßÀ» ¶§, healing abutmentÀÇ ³ôÀÌ°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï ¾ÈÁ¤¼º ¼öÄ¡°¡ ³·°Ô ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ AnyCheck°ú Periotest MÀ» 0¡Æ¿Í 30¡Æ ±â¿ï±â·Î ÃøÁ¤ ½Ã 0¡Æ·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ±×·ì¿¡¼­ ¾ÈÁ¤¼º ¼öÄ¡°¡ ´õ ³·°Ô ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤¼º ¼öÄ¡¸¦ ŸÁø¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÒ ¶§¿¡´Â healing abutment ³ôÀÌ¿Í Å¸Áø°¢µµÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷À̸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ÃøÁ¤ÇØ¾ß Ç¥ÁØÈ­µÈ Æò°¡¸¦ ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´õ¿í ¼¼¹ÐÇÑ »ç¿ë¹ýÀ» ÀÎÁöÇÒ ÇÊ¿ä°¡ ÀÖ´Ù°í »ç·áµÇ¾ú´Ù.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of healing abutment height and measurement angle on implant stability when using Periotest and AnyCheck.

Materials and methods: 60 implants were placed into artificial bone blocks. After implant insertion, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm healing abutments were installed on 15 specimens, respectively. Insertion torque value, implant stability test, Periotest value were measured. Insertion torque value was controlled between 45 - 55 Ncm. AnyCheck was used for measuring implant stability test and Periotest M was used for measuring Periotest value. Implant stability test and Periotest value were measured at the angles of 0 and 30 degrees to the horizontal plane. Measured values were analyzed statistically.
Results: Insertion torque value had no significant difference among groups. When healing abutment height was higher, implant stability test and Periotest value showed lower stability. Also when measurement angle was decreased, implant stability test and Periotest value showed lower stability.

Conclusion: When measuring stability of implants with percussion type devices, measured values should be evaluated considering height of healing abutments and measurement angle.

Å°¿öµå

ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¾ÈÁ¤¼º; AnyCheck; Periotest; Implant stability test; Periotest value; ½Ä¸³ ÅäÅ©
Implant stability; AnyCheck; Periotest; Implant stability test; Periotest value; Insertion torque value

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed